Framework for New Tenure Legislation Consultation Paper
Submission Form
Invitation to Make Submission
You are invited to complete the following submission form. The form has five numbered parts. Please complete Part 1 and as much of the other parts as possible. All views are important. The form should take no more than 20 minutes to complete and can be submitted up to and including
Friday 15th May 2009.
1. Information about Person/Organisation Making Submission
This information will assist in analysing and responding to the submissions received. Your personal details will be kept confidential and no views will be attributed to you or the organisation you represent in any published document without your agreement.
Your name
:
Your email address
:
Your postal address (If an email address not in use)
:
The capacity in which you are making the submission
:
-Select-
As an individual
As a representative of a state government department or agency
As a representative of a business
As a representative of an association or institute
As a representative of another organisation
If you are responding as a representative, the name of the business/organisation (government or private) you represent:
Your position in the business/organisation:
The field you as an individual or the business/organisation you represent, operates in or represents:
2. Tenure Legislation: Industry and Community Needs
This consultation paper identifies a need for new tenure legislation that is integrated, well structured, written in plain English, limited to tenure creation matters, standardises processes and requirements and provides greater flexibility.
Do you agree these are priorities for new tenure legislation?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Are there other priorities?
Yes
No
If so, what are they?
Why are they priorities?
3. Framework for New Tenure Legislation:Existing Principles
The consultation paper (p.9) lists existing principles that should be retained in the proposed new tenure legislation.
Do any of these principles need to be reviewed?
Yes
No
If so, which ones?
Why?
4. Framework for New Tenure Legislation: New Principles
Principle 1 proposes a single Act ("tenure Act") for the creation of tenure and identifies three implementation options: (1) a stand alone Act; (2) incorporating the tenure provisions in the Transfer of Land Act 1893; or (3) creating a community titles Act and leaving the title creating provisions in the TLA.
Do you support the creation of a single tenure Act?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Which option should be implemented?
-Select-
Create stand-alone tenure & title creation Act
Incorporate tenure-creation provisions in Transfer of Land Act 1893 (TLA)
Create community titles Act and leave title creation provisions in TLA
None of above
If another option should be implemented, please specify the option:
Why should it be implemented?
Principle 2 proposes that the tenure Act provide for the extension of community developement schemes to all types of land developments including freehold subdivisions and leasehold strata.
Do you support the extension of community development schemes to all types of land developement?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Principle 3 proposes that the tenure Act should provide for one or more management bodies to be established within a community development scheme and identifies two implementation options: (1) provide for the establishment of limited and unlimited management bodies (Victorian model); or (2) provide for the establishment of management bodies within 'layered" community development schemes (Queensland model)
Do you support the establishment of multiple management bodies within a community development scheme?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Which option should be implemented?
-Select-
Victorian Model
Queensland Model
None of above
If another option should be implemented, please specify the option:
Why should it be implemented?
Principle 4 proposes that the tenure Act should provide for the staging of community development schemes.
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
What should a developer's obligations be when undertaking a staged developement within a community development scheme?
Principle 5 proposes that the tenure Act should provide for a management statement to be lodged for each community developement scheme.
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Principle 6 proposes that the tenure Act should provide for management statements to adopt management rules appropriate to the nature of the community development scheme.
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Principle 7 proposes that the tenure Act should provide that community developement schemes established under the new Act may be terminated on the vote of less than 100% of affected owners and identifies two implementation options:(1) a resolution without dissent; or (2) a required percentage of owners to support.
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Which option should be implemented?
-Select-
Scheme terminated by resolution without dissent
Scheme terminated by resolution of prescribed percentage of owners
None of above
If another option should be implemented, please specify the option:
Why should it be implemented?
Principle 8 proposes a separate Act to regulate the management of community development schemes. As at present, this would include the regulation of community management bodies, councils of community management bodies, insurance, rates and taxes, dispute resolution and other current miscellaneous matters.
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Aside from current matters (see above), are there any other matters (eg strata title managers) that should be regulated under the proposed management Act?
Yes
No
If so, please specify
:
How should these matters be regulated?
Principle 9 proposes one form of plan to create tenure
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Should the legislation permit lots of all types to be created on the same plan?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Principle 10 proposes that only interests that can be spatially depicted over part of a lot or part of the land within a plan, are recorded on the plan.
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Principle 11 proposes that the tenure Act should provide for exisiting strata and survey-strata schemes to be brought under the operation of the Act and identifies two implementation options: (1)provide in tenure Act for existing schemes to be brought under tenure Act; or (2)let owners decide whether to bring existing schemes under tenure Act.
Do you support this principle?
Yes
No
If not, why?
Which option should be implemented?
-Select-
Provide for in new Act
Let owners decide
None of above
If another option should be implemented, please specify the option:
Why should it be implemented?
5. Other Comments.
Comments
:
Submission Report and Further Consultation
If you would like to receive a copy of any submission report or to be contacted in the event of further consultation, please indicate in the places provided below.
I would like a copy of any submission report to be sent to me.
Yes
No
I would like to be contacted in the event of further consultation.
Yes
No